You probably saw this picture of Jake Gyllenhaal with his manservant on Towle the other day:
Now take a look at these two other pictures, from Jake's performance on Saturday Night Live:
Notice any similarity? Here's my theory. The manservant's real name is Frank. Jake and Frank were in bed one night and Frank asked Jake for a proof of his love, and Jake said: "okay, so, like, I will host Saturday Night Live on January 13, and, like, I will have one of my characters in one of the skits be named Frank, just like you, and the character will wear that green jacket that you love so much; oh, and, like, every smile on that skit will mean that I am thinking of you, and that I love you. I just hope one of them queer bloggers doesn't find out about our secret message..." And then they kissed...or something.
So err if you look the hi "boyfriend's" jacket has a logo his dosn't?
no sense.
Posted by: po | Apr 06, 2008 at 09:45 AM
it's not gay. it just feels good to wear your boyfriend's shirt. not gay at all. ;)
Posted by: Dan | Feb 12, 2007 at 06:09 PM
Borrow a friend's shirt. I did that when I started dating my partner. It's not gay. It just felt good to wear his shirt.
Posted by: Alan | Feb 10, 2007 at 06:55 PM
a guy can't borrow a friend's shirt without being called gay? how immature.
Posted by: christina | Jan 26, 2007 at 07:09 PM
Wishful thinking
Posted by: Ramble Redhead | Jan 17, 2007 at 12:44 AM
hahahaha
lovez it!!
if only I were Frank :[
Posted by: John | Jan 16, 2007 at 02:54 PM
HA HAAAAA!! That's fabulous!!
Posted by: Ray | Jan 16, 2007 at 01:52 PM
All I know is most gays were sitting and drooling at Jake's appearance on SNL and secretly desiring to shout at him, "Jacket off, Jake!"
Posted by: Sidvicious | Jan 15, 2007 at 11:42 AM
The jackets aren't completely the same, though, in that the Nike swoosh is missing from the SNL one.
Perhaps something to do with copywrites and TV, but still...
Posted by: Brian Griffin | Jan 14, 2007 at 09:24 PM
Oh yeah, I saw that in a comment at Towle...but with his real name my story wouldn't be as, uh, cute...
;-)
Posted by: Queer Beacon | Jan 14, 2007 at 03:43 PM