ABOUT QUEER BEACON

  • The Queer Beacon offers insights as to the representation of gays in wider released movies.

    About | F.A.Q. | E-mail

    Press CTRL + D to bookmark

Search it like you mean it:


  • Powered by Rollyo

Browse Movies by Type of Content

Subscribe

Wear it proudly

For a bigger beacon:

  • GAY.COM Premium Dating - 50% Off Netflix, Inc.

The lawyer in me made me do this:

  • Queer Beacon does not claim credit for any images featured on this site unless otherwise noted. The copyright to the images on Queer Beacon belongs to its respective owner(s). Queer Beacon is not responsible for, or has control over, the content of any external web site links. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the site's proprietor does not make any warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images, and do not wish them to appear here, please contact us and they will be promptly removed.
  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs2.5 License.

Archives

More...

« Sex and the City - Trailer | Main | Talk shows and homophobia »

10,000 B.C. (2008) - No Gay Content

10000bcposter Man, this was unwatchable. 

In 10,000 B.C. this tribe is headed for extinction and have to rely on their warriors to survive. I did not care, except that I kept wishing I was on the set to shampoo those people. Barfy hair was everywhere.

10000bcstevenstraitbarfyhair

10000bcstevenstraittiger

No gay content.

Mar 15, 2008 at 07:44 PM in 2008, Bad Movies, Movies: T, No Gay Content |

Comments

hotgaynews

Definitely a very weak movie.. This proves that a good theme is not a magical solution

Posted by: hotgaynews | Apr 27, 2008 at 09:04 AM

shannon

Thank you.

Posted by: shannon | Mar 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM

Queer Beacon

That's right, Shannon ;-)

Posted by: Queer Beacon | Mar 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM

shannon

So. uhm, how was the F/X?
or was there even a plot. I tend to enjoy your reviews. This was was some what lacking in information. Am I to take that as "so bad not worth even revewing?"

Posted by: shannon | Mar 16, 2008 at 01:06 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.