Out.com just posted an interview with Stanley Tucci about his role in The Devil Wears Prada (read my movie review here).
Tucci discusses the matter of his sexuality in the movie: "Nigel’s demeanor implies he’s gay, but he never really discusses it. He glances at an attractive man in the film, and he discusses how in his youth he would hide under the covers reading the latest issue of Runway instead of going to soccer practice. Was it your choice to not focus on Nigel’s sexuality? [Tucci's answer:] That’s the way it was written. To me there was no other way to play it. He’s gay. No need to spell it out."
I disagree with Tucci, I think there is a need to spell it out. As pointed out by Dan in his comments to my review "I think it is just the "love that dare not speak it's name" crap in 2006. Why can't they utter the word gay or have some mention of this obvious fact. Perhaps not to offend? You can't have a movie about fashion without gay characters, yet here we have don't ask don't tell movie about the gayest industry in the world."
Out.com had another provocative question for Tucci: "Barney’s creative director, Simon Doonan, and E!’s Robert Verdi also auditioned for the part of Nigel. In his column Doonan claimed the casting was “nothing more than a carefully orchestrated piece of unpaid research. We gays had been dragged in to swish it up—on film, no less—for the delectation of some pre-cast, overpaid straight actor.” Why do you think you—the straight actor—got the part? [Tucci's answer:] I don’t know why someone would write such a piece. They really did not know what they wanted to do with this part. I think he’s imagining a much more Machiavellian scenario than actually exists. All I know is somebody called me, and I realized this was a great part."
I thought Stanley did a great job in The Devil Wears Prada. I loved his performance.
Recent Comments